Wednesday, January 18, 2012

We're moving!

Thank you for visiting and subscribing to our blog. Please visit our website for news and updates!

Monday, October 24, 2011

Thinking politically

Introspective by Calixto Chikiamco

Posted on October 23, 2011 08:23:50 PM

To solve our economic problems, we have to think politically. Yes, you read that right. We need political solutions to economic problems. We don’t lack capital. Our savings rate exceeds the investment rate. There are 1.5 trillion pesos in Special Deposit Accounts in Bangko Sentral that banks are unwilling or unable to use for lending. With interest rates in the US and most developed countries near zero, there are trillions in capital that can be tapped for investment projects here.

We don’t lack technology. Technology can be imported especially in an age of globalization in markets, finance, and transportation. Singapore, for example, has powered its industries with imported technology in such areas as biotech, medicine, and IT. We can do the same.
We don’t lack skilled human resources. We have the scientists, engineers, doctors, and accountants, not to mention the craftsmen, plumbers, and electricians who can provide the soft capital for growth. We even have a surplus of human resources relative to jobs here. This is why we are exporting them.
We don’t lack natural resources. In fact, we have plentiful natural resources, compared to a country like Singapore or Taiwan.
What we lack is in the political realm -- in the realm of institutions, governance, accountability, and rule of law. People normally ascribe their parlous material condition to “corruption.” However, “Corruption” is a catchall phrase because what we confront are problems of collective action, regulatory capture, rent-seeking, and patrimonialism.
The recent floods in Bulacan and Pampanga illustrate the political dimension of economic problems. Because of the floods, investors now hesitate to put up factories and generate jobs in those flood-stricken areas for fear of a repeat of the disaster. However, is climate change to blame for the floods or is it government failure?
Scientists have pinpointed fish pens impeding the flow of water to Manila Bay as a cause but nothing was done in the past to dismantle them. The state is too weak to assert public interest at the expense of narrow vested interests.
Furthermore, disaster prevention, response, recovery, and rehabilitation are public goods that the state must provide. However, the state has failed miserably to fulfill a major function, partly due to lack of resources: lack of money for dams, drainage canals, communications equipment, rescue boats, medicines, etc.
And why does the state perennially lack resources? Again, because it cannot assert the public interest at the expense of narrow, private interests. It gives away valuable communications spectrum instead of selling them. It gives away tax revenues in the forms of tax and duty-free incentives to economically and politically powerful groups, such as mining companies, renewable energy developers, cooperatives, etc.
How do we go about thinking politically to strengthen the state?
1. We need to separate the political class from the economic class. Only a political class that’s accountable to the people via credible elections can provide the power balance to the economic oligarchy.
To do this, most feasible idea at this point is the public financing of political parties, and possibly of electoral campaigns. Without public financing, the political class would be totally financially dependent on the economic oligarchy to fund increasingly expensive campaigns and its own political activities. The other alternative for the political class is to self-finance campaigns through its own corrupt money-making schemes, which undermines its will and capacity to do good governance. We have seen how the corrupt schemes in the Erap and GMA administrations can be very destabilizing.
2. We need to solve the collective action problem of the political class. Because of the absence of genuine political parties, the political class is simply outmaneuvered, outmanaged, and outclassed by the economic oligarchy. The economic oligarchy has its conglomerates and legions of agents who can do collective, unified action on its behalf. The political class, however, is dependent on kaklasekabarkadakabarilankanayon,kumparekapamilya or other fragile ties cemented by personal relationships to do its unified, collective action. Because the political class lacks the organizational ability to act on behalf of the public interest, it’s too weak to confront the maneuvers and machinations of the economic oligarchy.
The vacuum of collective action in the public sphere is sometimes filled by religion (hence, the outsized influence of the Catholic Church in Philippine politics), an unhealthy characteristic for a supposedly secular society.
3. We need to strengthen the bureaucracy. The political class alone cannot act to balance the power of the economic oligarchy. By its nature, the political class has a very short-term orientation since it’s fixated on the next election. It also must raise money, somewhere, somehow, perhaps illegally or from donations given by the economic oligarchy, to be able to get elected again and remain in power.
We must strengthen the bureaucracy because it can complement and provide a balance to the political class: it can have a longer-term orientation than simply the next election, it can be professionalized so that merit rather than politics can be the basis for positions, and it can provide stability to policies since the bureaucracy will be there, irrespective of who gets elected.
Will mining companies invest in the country if the government can’t provide basic security? Will manufacturers invest if distributors of fake imported goods cannot be caught? Will farmers plant if their produce rots because the roads are too bad to transport goods on? The answer is obviously No, and not because interest rates are too high or the yield curve is too steep.
The path to economic progress doesn’t lie in economic reforms alone. We need to think politically. Making that connection -- between politics and economics -- is the real meaning of “kung walang korupt, walang mahirap.”
Calixto V. Chikiamco is a board member of the Institute for Development and Econometric Analysis.
For comments and inquiries, please e-mail us at

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Cheaper renewable energy plans urged

Manila Bulletin
September 26, 2011, 5:58pm
MANILA, Philippines — Groups from the labor and industry sectors have proposed before the Aquino government a more discerning path toward its renewable energy (RE) program.
In a joint statement, the groups said the government should concentrate on developing cheaper RE projects which in the end would be more beneficial to consumers of electricity in the country.
“Defer any high-cost Renewable Energy Program – i.e., solar, wind, ocean – and focus on the cheaper ones such as biomass and run-of-river hydro and implement them through public auction like in other countries,” the joint statement read.
Signing the statement were Francis Chua of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI), Ernest Leung of the Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF), Sergio Ortiz-Luis Jr. of the Philippine Exporters Confederation (PhilExport), David Chua of the Philippine Steelmakers Association and Rep. Raymond Mendoza of the Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP) Party-List.
The groups stressed that the application of such lower-cost RE programs should give priority to the off-grid or so-called beneficial areas and bring their dispatch to the level of distribution, in order to avoid additional transmission charges.
According to them, the direction and action of the RE Board must “focus on evaluating the development of RE generation in the country and its impact on the economy as well as the buying power of consumers.”
“R.A. 9513 is already complied with in substance as of now,” the groups said, referring to the Renewable Energy Act of 2008. The proposals were given amid concerns on the cost of electricity in the Philippines, now regarded as the highest in Asia.
Meanwhile, Energy Secretary Jose Rene Almendras insisted that the RE prospects in the country remain “bright” and continues to be one of the investment spots for power generation.
“There are available technologies that are now ready for aggressive implementation,” Almendras bared. He said each technology has its inherent economic and technical characteristics and must be applied to specific local realities.
"There are also primary economic considerations which require that we pace our RE programs learning from the difficulties experienced by other countries," he added.